Fun philosophical question:
Imagine a Burning Man theme camp is created by a large group of people.
Imagine that there are some issues with building, so someone steps
forward as a new leader to save the day.
Imagine that this leader does a great job bringing everyone together to
get shit done.
Imagine that this new leader agreed with the founder of the camp that
they will buy the camp for $1 and take ownership of all of the camp's gear.
Imagine that this is actually completely unknown to the rest of the
camp. The rest of the camp that has spent all the money in camp dues
that actually bought most of this gear.
Imagine that camp is rebuilt under this new leader and things are
going well. Except that camp dues stay the same $300+ that were
needed for the rebuild, and when asked about the availability for
funds for projects that will improve the camp, the leader's response
is that there's little money left.
Except now imagine that the reality is that lots of money is left,
but this leader has been pocketing half of the camper dues, at
almost $13,000 over the last two years.
And the burner camp accountant doesn't want to put up with this anymore,
and wants to tell the camp, and the leader asks him not to, because
this information should not get out.
And it does get out. And people complain. And one by one they are
"kicked out of camp" by the new leader, who has now fashioned himself
after a fascist dictator, instead of after a leader of a community of
people who work like a family.
So the town won't have it. The town removes the leader from his position.
Does the leader give the money back? Of course not. But even better,
the leader claims ownership over all of the town's gear and won't let
the town use it. The gear that they bought and paid for, the gear that
the leader hasn't paid for, except perhaps for that initial dollar that
he put in, minus the $13k he took out of the camp's profits.
The camp wants it's gear back that it paid for and is now being claimed
by the person who took half of the camp dues to pay himself for his
work, thereby removing any excuse he might have for ownership of any of it?
Well that's okay, he's willing to sell the gear to the camp for $4000.
Or rent it for $1500, with a deposit. What kind of person do you think
would do something like this? A businessman. But a businessman who is
trying to ultimately maximize his profits and power at the further expense
of the community that he screwed over.
He demands everything. Not just the camp dues he took, but all the
gear, and the connections with the BMorg (as if they'd be interested
into talking to him), and the domain name and email and blah, blah blah.
Amusingly enough, this
domain name, which is the actual name
of the camp, is not owned by the camp. So he doesn't get that.
The leader's excuse? He ran the camp like a business and it ran well,
so there were profits, like you would see in a good business, and he
owns it all. His view is that he's the only one capable of running
this theme camp, regardless of the fact that there are plenty of other
people in the camp who have successfully run theme camps and art projects
of a much larger scale that this camp. But that's not a concern to the
worldview of someone who thinks he created and owns and deserves everything.
Now you don't have to imagine. Because the story is true, but fortunately
the story has a happy ending. The town rebuilds, again, and stronger, with
a vision of transparency and clear community ownership. Because Burning Man
is not about maximizing profits, it's about maximizing an amazing experience
amongst a huge family that comes home to the playa every year.
Can't wait to see you at home, unless of course your name is Sam Wolanyk
Don't need to see you there, Sam, because you don't have a fucking clue what
Burning Man is actually about.